You are at: Home » Any questions for Stoneleigh?

Transition Culture

An Evolving Exploration into the Head, Heart and Hands of Energy Descent


12 Nov 2010

Any questions for Stoneleigh?

Many of you who attended or followed the 2010 Transition Network conference will have either been to, or have subsequently listened to Stoneleigh’s presentation, which led to the coining of the term ‘The Stoneleigh Effect’, which generally consists of rather glazed eyes, sweaty palms and a look of distinct panic.  Well, in a few weeks, Stoneleigh is back in the UK to do a short series of talks (I will let you know the itinerary when I have it), and Peter Lipman and myself, the Paxman and Dimbleby of Transition, will be interviewing Stoneleigh for this very website.  We’d love to know what questions you would like to ask her, and we’ll take as many of your questions as we can along to the interview.  Do post any questions you have in the comments below…. Thanks.

Categories: Economics, Peak Oil

14 Comments

Michael Q
12 Nov 11:06pm

I’m curious to know why she calls herself “Stoneleigh”? (& why “Ilargi”?)

samagita
13 Nov 1:23pm

What is your view on my observation that your presentations give rise to individualistic financial panic rather than to a positive collective response?

Skintnick
14 Nov 9:14am

I sense that underneath the big society concept lies some sort of acknowledgement of (and response to) the impending credit contraction. In which case the core strategists in the new British government have realised that globalisation and the free hand accorded to banks and trans-national corporations has been a malign policy, although they cannot (yet) admit it.

Do you share that feeling? Do you think it’s possible for a government to make a unilateral response to the financial crisis you predict, in order to effect some sort of managed descent?

Andrew Ramponi
14 Nov 12:39pm

I agree with your general message, but responding appropriately with respect to the timing of any major societal change is difficult.

Governments and nations seem to be remarkably resilient,and able to resist significant change for much longer than we might imagine; North Korea and Zimbabwe for example. Does it not seem quite likely that business as usual in most countries could go on for several decades?

Humanity may suffer from a super plague or some other catastrophe long before it is radically affected by the obvious financial and energy problems.

Patrick Cleary
14 Nov 5:46pm

You are rightly critical of government’s response to the bursting of the credit bubble. How would you advise the UK government to respond to the situation as it stands today.

tom
14 Nov 8:50pm

I’d be interested to hear what she thinks of Feasta’s idea of a ‘Liquidity Network’.

tom
14 Nov 8:54pm

Ah, ok.

I’d be interested to hear what she thinks of Feasta’s idea of a ‘Liquidity Network’.

Shane Hughes
14 Nov 8:56pm

In an economically constrained world we are going to be forced to learn to live with a lot less of everything including GHG producing, resource peaking, fossil fuels.

What do you say to the life long environmentalist that starts to think why don’t i just have a blow out (fly around the world etc) as economic collapse will reduce carbon faster than any treaty and blunt our ability to conusme dwindelling oil mucher quicker than any wel lintended transitional community initiative making peak oil irrelivent. Job done, might as well enjoy the last of the party.

Dave Dann
15 Nov 7:44pm

Many of the readers of this blog will be familiar with the views of Chris Martenson and his ‘Crash Course’.
I’d like Stoneleigh to outline the main areas of agreement and disagreement between their respective views of our path toward economic collapse. (Martenson seems to emphasise the devaluation of national currencies through inflation while Stoneleigh seems to emphasise collapse of the banking system).
There is also one point of detail about which I’m confused. When I was studying economics at school, although it was nearly 40 years ago, I’m sure that inflation was defined as ‘rising prices’ and therefore deflation was ‘falling prices’. However I think Stoneleigh describes a possible outcome in which she says there will be both inflation and deflation at the same time (sorry – can’t give a reference). This is obviously not possible according to my definitions. Is this because Stoneleigh’s ‘deflation’ is actually defined as a fall in the real amount of purchasing power due to the financial system not creating credit (money) as fast as prices are rising?

Max
15 Nov 8:34pm

The ‘How to Build a Lifeboat’ post in Automatic Earth , (Stoneleigh’s blog) seems to me to be quite individualistic rather in the tradition of US homesteaders. It also appears to assume some personal wealth, and access to land.
What would be a community/national response ideally be, or is a broader community response unrealistic in her opinion. Is a fleet of ‘lifeboats’ what we need?

andy brewin
16 Nov 1:42pm

Michael,

I assume she is called Stoneleigh because she attended Warwick Business School which is based in Stoneleigh, just outside Coventry.

Andy

andy brewin
16 Nov 1:46pm

Michael,

Ilargi is the daughter of Mother Earth.

Andy

Actifedje
18 Nov 12:39am

What are the potentials for establishing new alternative currencies to maintain essential transactions in a globalised world as current exchange system crumbles?

Skintnick
20 Nov 12:45am

Thanks Actifedje. Stoneleigh has correctly predicted the “pull to the centre” as capitalism realises its inevitable demise – a dash for the cash. And this may be seen here in the UK? The sinister take on coalition branding of big society is perhaps their vision of localisation is simply the pull writ large. Extend and pretend. If, as she believes is imminent, a fast systemic collapse occurs then the previous question is urgent! (and focuses on resilience)