<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Interview with Neil Adger: resilience, adaptability, localisation and Transition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/</link>
	<description>An Evolving Exploration into the Head, Heart and Hands of Energy Descent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:35:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Resilience. &#124; Learning CME Online</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-70248</link>
		<dc:creator>Resilience. &#124; Learning CME Online</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:14:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-70248</guid>
		<description>[...] Download video on climate resilience from  http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localis... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Download video on climate resilience from  http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localis&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Dodd Racher</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67364</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Dodd Racher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 19:20:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67364</guid>
		<description>Pierre-Louis, maybe more thought should be applied to the conflicts between resilience and complex technologies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pierre-Louis, maybe more thought should be applied to the conflicts between resilience and complex technologies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre-Louis</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67346</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre-Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 06:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67346</guid>
		<description>&quot;unless participants tackle the unequal power distributions enforced by multinational corporatism, significantly through the mechanism of the revolving door.&quot;

Indeed globalisation promotes interests of large companies like Monsanto to become global and &quot;eat up&quot; the small one and create dependancy f.e. with their GM seeds. The latter render farmers dependant on Monsanto for seeds but as well with producers of Roundup and chemical fertilizers, whitout which these seeds would be useless.  Well orchestrated and vicious marketing plan.

That is the complete antiquation of resilience and should be clearly rejected. But many well know CC experts like David Kind are &quot;promoting&quot; that sort of technical innovations (OGM)because they are going to &quot;solve hunger problems&quot;. I wonder how much they are being paid for saying such lies ?

The other problem I believe is that many have lost his ability to see long term and wide negative implications of such &quot;innovative technic&quot;.

Regards PL

PL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;unless participants tackle the unequal power distributions enforced by multinational corporatism, significantly through the mechanism of the revolving door.&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed globalisation promotes interests of large companies like Monsanto to become global and &#8220;eat up&#8221; the small one and create dependancy f.e. with their GM seeds. The latter render farmers dependant on Monsanto for seeds but as well with producers of Roundup and chemical fertilizers, whitout which these seeds would be useless.  Well orchestrated and vicious marketing plan.</p>
<p>That is the complete antiquation of resilience and should be clearly rejected. But many well know CC experts like David Kind are &#8220;promoting&#8221; that sort of technical innovations (OGM)because they are going to &#8220;solve hunger problems&#8221;. I wonder how much they are being paid for saying such lies ?</p>
<p>The other problem I believe is that many have lost his ability to see long term and wide negative implications of such &#8220;innovative technic&#8221;.</p>
<p>Regards PL</p>
<p>PL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Hopkins and Neil Adger on transition towns and resilience &#124; Resilience Science</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67344</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Hopkins and Neil Adger on transition towns and resilience &#124; Resilience Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 21:19:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67344</guid>
		<description>[...] Hopkins founder of the Transition movement has a long interview with Neil Adger on resilience, peak oil, and climate adaptation on Transition Culture.  Neil Adger is a professor [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Hopkins founder of the Transition movement has a long interview with Neil Adger on resilience, peak oil, and climate adaptation on Transition Culture.  Neil Adger is a professor [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patricia Dodd Racher</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67343</link>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Dodd Racher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67343</guid>
		<description>Interesting, but I think the word &#039;globalisation&#039; tends to be used as an abstract, autonomous concept, whereas it is a construct of unequal power relations. I agree that Transition Towns cannot develop in isolation from the wider world, but fear their development will be curtailed unless participants tackle the unequal power distributions enforced by multinational corporatism, significantly through the mechanism of the revolving door.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, but I think the word &#8216;globalisation&#8217; tends to be used as an abstract, autonomous concept, whereas it is a construct of unequal power relations. I agree that Transition Towns cannot develop in isolation from the wider world, but fear their development will be curtailed unless participants tackle the unequal power distributions enforced by multinational corporatism, significantly through the mechanism of the revolving door.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michael Dunwell</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67341</link>
		<dc:creator>michael Dunwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67341</guid>
		<description>Did the good Professor rather back off when Rob asked him to add peak oil to the equation?  I find that academics are almost as paralysed by what&#039;s happening as politicians, lawyers, capitalists and my plumber: the reality of energy descent is too hard.  And that very academic distinction between sustainability and resilience seemed, well, pretty academic...
When its Dr. Hopkins I do hope Rob continues to come at things his own way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the good Professor rather back off when Rob asked him to add peak oil to the equation?  I find that academics are almost as paralysed by what&#8217;s happening as politicians, lawyers, capitalists and my plumber: the reality of energy descent is too hard.  And that very academic distinction between sustainability and resilience seemed, well, pretty academic&#8230;<br />
When its Dr. Hopkins I do hope Rob continues to come at things his own way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly (weekly) &#171; Southend-on-Sea in Transition</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67312</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly (weekly) &#171; Southend-on-Sea in Transition</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Mar 2010 00:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67312</guid>
		<description>[...] An Interview with Neil Adger: resilience, adaptability, localisation and Transition » Transition Cu... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] An Interview with Neil Adger: resilience, adaptability, localisation and Transition » Transition Cu&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: An Interview with Neil Adger: Resilience, Adaptability &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67296</link>
		<dc:creator>An Interview with Neil Adger: Resilience, Adaptability &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 20:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67296</guid>
		<description>[...] direction of a social justice agenda? Could one also distinguish a healthy resilience &#8230;Continue       Cancel [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] direction of a social justice agenda? Could one also distinguish a healthy resilience &#8230;Continue       Cancel [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan Butler</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67293</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 19:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67293</guid>
		<description>I agree, as things are now, we&#039;re way overbalanced towards sourcing our needs through globalization. By that means we&#039;ve lost the options we had for producing things locally. Thus an urgent need to relearn local skills. However, resilience is about having as many means as possible, having lots of choices, lots of redundancy. It would be a loss to be completely cut off from global communication and trade. 

Being resilient at the large scale and thus able to change the way we do globalization could lead to more of a focus on long-term maintenance of the global internet and the trading of ideas rather than maintaining heavy shipping for trading tons of tomatoes round the world, as we do now.

We don&#039;t have any global ability to make such a rational choice at that level. Still, maybe this choice can emerge at lower levels. Were many localities to get very strong at producing their own tomatoes, the market for centralized production would disappear. Here&#039;s an example of how autonomy at smaller scales can contribute to overall resiliency.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, as things are now, we&#8217;re way overbalanced towards sourcing our needs through globalization. By that means we&#8217;ve lost the options we had for producing things locally. Thus an urgent need to relearn local skills. However, resilience is about having as many means as possible, having lots of choices, lots of redundancy. It would be a loss to be completely cut off from global communication and trade. </p>
<p>Being resilient at the large scale and thus able to change the way we do globalization could lead to more of a focus on long-term maintenance of the global internet and the trading of ideas rather than maintaining heavy shipping for trading tons of tomatoes round the world, as we do now.</p>
<p>We don&#8217;t have any global ability to make such a rational choice at that level. Still, maybe this choice can emerge at lower levels. Were many localities to get very strong at producing their own tomatoes, the market for centralized production would disappear. Here&#8217;s an example of how autonomy at smaller scales can contribute to overall resiliency.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre-Louis</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2010/03/26/an-interview-with-neil-adger-resilience-adaptability-localisation-and-transition/comment-page-1/#comment-67278</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre-Louis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=3410#comment-67278</guid>
		<description>I beg to differ with Neil with regard to advantages of a global economy. I really believe that local production for local people with local resources are the objectives of a low carbon development. While a global development foster production across the world with the cheapest manpower in the world and resources pinched wherever they are on earth. Isn’t it that the global system has created the mess where we are ?

Regards

PL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I beg to differ with Neil with regard to advantages of a global economy. I really believe that local production for local people with local resources are the objectives of a low carbon development. While a global development foster production across the world with the cheapest manpower in the world and resources pinched wherever they are on earth. Isn’t it that the global system has created the mess where we are ?</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>PL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

