<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Burning Wood Really A Long-Term Energy Descent Strategy?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/</link>
	<description>An Evolving Exploration into the Head, Heart and Hands of Energy Descent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:27:01 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rae</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-60871</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 12:10:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-60871</guid>
		<description>I would make the following points:
1) Often the wood used to run a wood burner or chip boiler is a by-product of other forestry operations and not the main crop,
2) The CO2 and Nitrous Oxide contained in the wood will be released through natural decomposition of the wood on the forest floor so it is either there  or released whilst warming
3) We should not get to hung-up on carbon neutrality - research by the Forestry Commission suggests that wood collection and transport typically accounts for between 2%-4% of overall carbon account.
4) The FC has also estimated that sustainable yield from existing woodlands could contribute 5% of space heating needs - wood is never destined as the only answer but as part of a fix where energy efficiency is the priority,
Good luck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would make the following points:<br />
1) Often the wood used to run a wood burner or chip boiler is a by-product of other forestry operations and not the main crop,<br />
2) The CO2 and Nitrous Oxide contained in the wood will be released through natural decomposition of the wood on the forest floor so it is either there  or released whilst warming<br />
3) We should not get to hung-up on carbon neutrality &#8211; research by the Forestry Commission suggests that wood collection and transport typically accounts for between 2%-4% of overall carbon account.<br />
4) The FC has also estimated that sustainable yield from existing woodlands could contribute 5% of space heating needs &#8211; wood is never destined as the only answer but as part of a fix where energy efficiency is the priority,<br />
Good luck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Callie Gauntlett</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-59318</link>
		<dc:creator>Callie Gauntlett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 11:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-59318</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Installed an Esse wood burning cooker  and  solar panels last year.  Use this and a Joutel wood burner to heat a 4 bed semi stone built 150 year old cottage.  Have cavity wall insulation where  walls are new old walls are 3 foot thick, extra  loft insulation,  half windows  double glazed  saving for others,  all floors  insulated.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This system  keeps us sort of warm with jumpers vests blankets 2 pair socks and  hot water bottles in the winter, provides 3 showers a day and water for washing up and all  cooking from  scratch  including bread,  jams etc.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Wood supply is difficult as the flu can get damaged  by wet tarry wood, we collect some of ours from where it  is unwanted and buy rest from  sustainable cartel.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We had to build a second v  large shed  from recycled timber to store the wood in,we have to carry wood around every day which helps keep us warm  and fit.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;THis works for us, but we have room and live in the country I don&#039;t think it  could possibly be  the solution for everyone.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There will be many solutions the important thing is to accept that it will take time,  faith and dedication to find them.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;All we need is for everyone to work towards doing  something  better than what they are doing today.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As far as the population  goes I really feel that we have to work towards population targets which take into account what  the country can reasonably sustain in an eco friendly way. Anything else is madness and ignores the right of  the other creatures  with which we share this planet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Installed an Esse wood burning cooker  and  solar panels last year.  Use this and a Joutel wood burner to heat a 4 bed semi stone built 150 year old cottage.  Have cavity wall insulation where  walls are new old walls are 3 foot thick, extra  loft insulation,  half windows  double glazed  saving for others,  all floors  insulated.</p>
<p>This system  keeps us sort of warm with jumpers vests blankets 2 pair socks and  hot water bottles in the winter, provides 3 showers a day and water for washing up and all  cooking from  scratch  including bread,  jams etc.</p>
<p>Wood supply is difficult as the flu can get damaged  by wet tarry wood, we collect some of ours from where it  is unwanted and buy rest from  sustainable cartel.</p>
<p>We had to build a second v  large shed  from recycled timber to store the wood in,we have to carry wood around every day which helps keep us warm  and fit.</p>
<p>THis works for us, but we have room and live in the country I don&#8217;t think it  could possibly be  the solution for everyone.</p>
<p>There will be many solutions the important thing is to accept that it will take time,  faith and dedication to find them.</p>
<p>All we need is for everyone to work towards doing  something  better than what they are doing today.</p>
<p>As far as the population  goes I really feel that we have to work towards population targets which take into account what  the country can reasonably sustain in an eco friendly way. Anything else is madness and ignores the right of  the other creatures  with which we share this planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: octopod</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-59303</link>
		<dc:creator>octopod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 21:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-59303</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh goodness, hang on a second, haven&#039;t you folks ever heard of gasifier stoves? They keep the methane from being released -- keep it and burn it instead. They use a very small amount of wood and get two heating cycles out of it. Google it!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh goodness, hang on a second, haven&#8217;t you folks ever heard of gasifier stoves? They keep the methane from being released &#8212; keep it and burn it instead. They use a very small amount of wood and get two heating cycles out of it. Google it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Burnett</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-58430</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 19:03:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-58430</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;A bit about the recent talk on wood burning for Transition Town Westcliff
http://westclifftransition.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/wood-fuel-for-a-low-energy-future/&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit about the recent talk on wood burning for Transition Town Westcliff<br />
<a href="http://westclifftransition.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/wood-fuel-for-a-low-energy-future/" rel="nofollow">http://westclifftransition.wordpress.com/2008/07/21/wood-fuel-for-a-low-energy-future/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wood Fuel for a low energy future &#171; Transition Town Westcliff&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-58426</link>
		<dc:creator>Wood Fuel for a low energy future &#171; Transition Town Westcliff&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-58426</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] for a future Westcliff, a large urban area. There have been some questions from sections of the Transition Movement about the viability of wood burning as a long term energy descent strategy, however Jay was clear that wood fuel is only part of the picture, stressing that in order to be a [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for a future Westcliff, a large urban area. There have been some questions from sections of the Transition Movement about the viability of wood burning as a long term energy descent strategy, however Jay was clear that wood fuel is only part of the picture, stressing that in order to be a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Slack</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-58111</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Slack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-58111</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Here are some references which suggest that the answer to the question is &#039;yes&#039; for modern systems:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/projects/task38casestudies/uk-brochure.pdf www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6VH3-4HVF13B-2&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=84f4a8c307469cd5deb566c600bd76de .&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;See these links for the conditions in which high CH4 and N2O are seen in biomass combustion:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;www.ghgonline.org/methanebioburn.htm and www.ghgonline.org/nitrousbioburn.htm .&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some references which suggest that the answer to the question is &#8216;yes&#8217; for modern systems:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/projects/task38casestudies/uk-brochure.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ieabioenergy-task38.org/projects/task38casestudies/uk-brochure.pdf</a> <a href="http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6VH3-4HVF13B-2&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=84f4a8c307469cd5deb566c600bd76de" rel="nofollow">http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&amp;_udi=B6VH3-4HVF13B-2&amp;_user=10&amp;_rdoc=1&amp;_fmt=&amp;_orig=search&amp;_sort=d&amp;view=c&amp;_acct=C000050221&amp;_version=1&amp;_urlVersion=0&amp;_userid=10&amp;md5=84f4a8c307469cd5deb566c600bd76de</a> .</p>
<p>See these links for the conditions in which high CH4 and N2O are seen in biomass combustion:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.ghgonline.org/methanebioburn.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghgonline.org/methanebioburn.htm</a> and <a href="http://www.ghgonline.org/nitrousbioburn.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.ghgonline.org/nitrousbioburn.htm</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Slack</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-58100</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Slack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 15:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-58100</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;It would be useful to have direct web references for some of the statistics quoted - the production of methane and nitrogen dioxide for example.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also essential to distinguish between old fashioned log stoves and modern wood burning boilers. I find it hard to believe that methane can get through a modern boiler unscathed - this is methane, CH4, natural gas!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also be clear on the various oxides of nitrogen. NO2 - nitrogen dioxide - NOT a greenhouse gas but a contributor to smog. N2O - nitrous oxide - the potent greenhouse gas. So which is it?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be useful to have direct web references for some of the statistics quoted &#8211; the production of methane and nitrogen dioxide for example.</p>
<p>Also essential to distinguish between old fashioned log stoves and modern wood burning boilers. I find it hard to believe that methane can get through a modern boiler unscathed &#8211; this is methane, CH4, natural gas!</p>
<p>Also be clear on the various oxides of nitrogen. NO2 &#8211; nitrogen dioxide &#8211; NOT a greenhouse gas but a contributor to smog. N2O &#8211; nitrous oxide &#8211; the potent greenhouse gas. So which is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Atkins</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57621</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57621</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Would these be the same people who enjoy taking cruise ship holidays to Antarctica whilst warming themselves under gas patio heaters?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;x steve&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7219565.stm&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would these be the same people who enjoy taking cruise ship holidays to Antarctica whilst warming themselves under gas patio heaters?</p>
<p>x steve</p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7219565.stm" rel="nofollow">http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7219565.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graham Burnett</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57620</link>
		<dc:creator>Graham Burnett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 10:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57620</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh, you&#039;ve met my kids then??? (:&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you&#8217;ve met my kids then??? (:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Samuel</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57616</link>
		<dc:creator>James Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 09:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57616</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Or there are those who walk around in T-shirts and complain its cold.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or there are those who walk around in T-shirts and complain its cold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leanne Veitch</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57609</link>
		<dc:creator>Leanne Veitch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 04:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57609</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The most efficient thing to do, to the best of my knowledge, is to insulate your home to the best level available (walls, ceiling, gaps, under floor etc.), and double or triple glaze your windows THEN and ONLY then get the heater installed!&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve lost track of the amount of homes I&#039;ve been into where the owners complain about their heating bills, yet haven&#039;t bothered to insulate or get double-glazing!&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The most efficient thing to do, to the best of my knowledge, is to insulate your home to the best level available (walls, ceiling, gaps, under floor etc.), and double or triple glaze your windows THEN and ONLY then get the heater installed!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve lost track of the amount of homes I&#8217;ve been into where the owners complain about their heating bills, yet haven&#8217;t bothered to insulate or get double-glazing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Atkins</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57561</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Atkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 07:20:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57561</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m enjoying this blog - very informative, really helpful stuff (including Martin Crawford&#039;s article).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&#039;d be interested to read an article and discussions on population.
Not that I don&#039;t like people -  there are just too many of us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;x steve&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m enjoying this blog &#8211; very informative, really helpful stuff (including Martin Crawford&#8217;s article).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested to read an article and discussions on population.<br />
Not that I don&#8217;t like people &#8211;  there are just too many of us.</p>
<p>x steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Markus Hohmann</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57554</link>
		<dc:creator>Markus Hohmann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 22:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57554</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, here is an example from the south west of Ireland: 4-Bedroom house with over 120 square meters, sheep-wool insulation, passive solar heating and masonry stove for space heating and warm water needs about 2 tonnes of wood (green weight).
The masonry stove works on total combustion principle which produces a lot less greenhouse gases than normal wood stoves.
Burning wood is always carbon-neutral, since it comes from within the biosphere, however it might not be completely climate-neutral.
It certainly is a good solution for some people, but keep in mind there are no final solutions to the problems caused by over-population, except a painful reduction of the population size.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, here is an example from the south west of Ireland: 4-Bedroom house with over 120 square meters, sheep-wool insulation, passive solar heating and masonry stove for space heating and warm water needs about 2 tonnes of wood (green weight).<br />
The masonry stove works on total combustion principle which produces a lot less greenhouse gases than normal wood stoves.<br />
Burning wood is always carbon-neutral, since it comes from within the biosphere, however it might not be completely climate-neutral.<br />
It certainly is a good solution for some people, but keep in mind there are no final solutions to the problems caused by over-population, except a painful reduction of the population size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57551</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 20:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57551</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, I can&#039;t match Albert&#039;s quantitative analysis, but qualitatively speaking I can say that we still haven&#039;t finished burning the oak offcuts from the roof of our cob cabin, which we finished roofing in the winter before last. Even including all the scavenged wood we also got through, I&#039;m reckoning less than half a tonne of not-particularly-dry wood in two winters.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Mind you we&#039;re talking about a 15 square metre cob cabin (i.e. very good thermal mass), in Northern Spain. Our climate is pretty similar to Devon&#039;s, only about 3 degrees warmer... i.e. roughly what Devonians can be looking forward to in a few decades. By the way, climate change doesn&#039;t seem to have been included in the analyses of heating costs in Britain - another reason why the estimates of wood required for heating seem to be overly pessimistic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We recently changed from an open fire to a closed steel stove, mainly for indoor air quality reasons. But we were unable to find a reasonably priced high-efficiency stove (one that burns the wood at a high temperature to minimise smoke).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way we&#039;ve just been experimenting with &quot;outsulating&quot; (insulating on the outside) the north wall of the cabin using a straw-clay slip mix. Have to see what (if any discernable) difference this makes to the cabin&#039;s comfort levels this coming winter...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can&#8217;t match Albert&#8217;s quantitative analysis, but qualitatively speaking I can say that we still haven&#8217;t finished burning the oak offcuts from the roof of our cob cabin, which we finished roofing in the winter before last. Even including all the scavenged wood we also got through, I&#8217;m reckoning less than half a tonne of not-particularly-dry wood in two winters.</p>
<p>Mind you we&#8217;re talking about a 15 square metre cob cabin (i.e. very good thermal mass), in Northern Spain. Our climate is pretty similar to Devon&#8217;s, only about 3 degrees warmer&#8230; i.e. roughly what Devonians can be looking forward to in a few decades. By the way, climate change doesn&#8217;t seem to have been included in the analyses of heating costs in Britain &#8211; another reason why the estimates of wood required for heating seem to be overly pessimistic.</p>
<p>We recently changed from an open fire to a closed steel stove, mainly for indoor air quality reasons. But we were unable to find a reasonably priced high-efficiency stove (one that burns the wood at a high temperature to minimise smoke).</p>
<p>By the way we&#8217;ve just been experimenting with &#8220;outsulating&#8221; (insulating on the outside) the north wall of the cabin using a straw-clay slip mix. Have to see what (if any discernable) difference this makes to the cabin&#8217;s comfort levels this coming winter&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Albert Bates</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-57549</link>
		<dc:creator>Albert Bates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/2008/05/19/is-burning-wood-really-a-long-term-energy-descent-strategy/#comment-57549</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The numbers for firewood consumption for heating seemed quite high to me, so I went and researched how much wood I consumed each year for the past 10 years. I have no heat source other than south-side windows, a wood heater, and my own body. I found that over 10 years, on average I used 1000 pounds green weight of oak (before typically 10-14 months drying time) per year. Here are some details:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I lived in a two-room straw cabin, approximately 750 sq. feet. Bales were stacked &quot;Nebraska style&quot; and walls were 18-20 inches thick. The roof was insulated with bedded straw between the ceiling rafters. Windows were single pane and doors were not weatherstripped.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My woodstove was a Vermont Castings Intrepid-II, which has a catalytic converter.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;White oak and red oak has a heating value of 26.4 - 28.0 btu/cord. A green cord is 4890 - 6290 pounds, with 30-40% weight loss during drying.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I am at 35.4° N 87.3° W but because of our altitude, we experience severe weather during winter months. Our first frost is mid-October and our last frost is typically at the end of May. Most of the days between those dates could require some use of the woodstove. Maximum cold temperature during that period was -23F (-32C). We get 8 to 20 inches of snow, usually.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Because we have 200+ sunny days per year, an attached greenhouse is essential, although I confess, my cabin is deep in the forest and I did not add a sun room until this year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In conclusion, I would say that design of the living space is as important as any other factor. There are a good many designs these days for zero-energy buildings, and when one combines zero-energy goals with natural building techniques, the best of all results occur: warm interior space with minimal maintenance, energy use and impact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One other note I have on the post: when calculating net sequestration one must consider the tree&#039;s roots.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I defend my choice of wood heat as appropriate for where I live (inside a large forest which is well-zoned and caretaked), but agree that it is entirely inappropriate for many locations.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the excellent contribution.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The numbers for firewood consumption for heating seemed quite high to me, so I went and researched how much wood I consumed each year for the past 10 years. I have no heat source other than south-side windows, a wood heater, and my own body. I found that over 10 years, on average I used 1000 pounds green weight of oak (before typically 10-14 months drying time) per year. Here are some details:</p>
<p>I lived in a two-room straw cabin, approximately 750 sq. feet. Bales were stacked &#8220;Nebraska style&#8221; and walls were 18-20 inches thick. The roof was insulated with bedded straw between the ceiling rafters. Windows were single pane and doors were not weatherstripped.</p>
<p>My woodstove was a Vermont Castings Intrepid-II, which has a catalytic converter.</p>
<p>White oak and red oak has a heating value of 26.4 &#8211; 28.0 btu/cord. A green cord is 4890 &#8211; 6290 pounds, with 30-40% weight loss during drying.</p>
<p>I am at 35.4° N 87.3° W but because of our altitude, we experience severe weather during winter months. Our first frost is mid-October and our last frost is typically at the end of May. Most of the days between those dates could require some use of the woodstove. Maximum cold temperature during that period was -23F (-32C). We get 8 to 20 inches of snow, usually.</p>
<p>Because we have 200+ sunny days per year, an attached greenhouse is essential, although I confess, my cabin is deep in the forest and I did not add a sun room until this year.</p>
<p>In conclusion, I would say that design of the living space is as important as any other factor. There are a good many designs these days for zero-energy buildings, and when one combines zero-energy goals with natural building techniques, the best of all results occur: warm interior space with minimal maintenance, energy use and impact.</p>
<p>One other note I have on the post: when calculating net sequestration one must consider the tree&#8217;s roots.</p>
<p>I defend my choice of wood heat as appropriate for where I live (inside a large forest which is well-zoned and caretaked), but agree that it is entirely inappropriate for many locations.</p>
<p>Thanks for the excellent contribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
