<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Greenpeace Launch New  Film on Decentralised Energy.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transitionculture.org/2006/06/23/greenpeace-launch-new-film-on-decentralised-energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transitionculture.org/2006/06/23/greenpeace-launch-new-film-on-decentralised-energy/</link>
	<description>An Evolving Exploration into the Head, Heart and Hands of Energy Descent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Greenpeace Video on Decentralized Energy</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2006/06/23/greenpeace-launch-new-film-on-decentralised-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1288</link>
		<dc:creator>P2P Foundation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Greenpeace Video on Decentralized Energy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 12:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=383#comment-1288</guid>
		<description>[...] Reblogged from the Transition Culture blog &#8220;Greenpeace have just launched an excellent new film called Decentralised Energy - what are we waiting for?, which sets out a very clear argument for decentralised energy. It runs for 18 minutes and is narrated by Clive Anderson. The film sets out a very clear argument for a profound rethink of the National Grid, using the argument that climate change means we have a rapidly reduce carbon emissions, rather than the, in my view, equally compelling argument that it is madness to use a depleting resource in such a wasteful way. The film looks at the jewel in the decentralisers’ crown, Woking, and argues that it offers a model for the rest of the UK.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Reblogged from the Transition Culture blog &#8220;Greenpeace have just launched an excellent new film called Decentralised Energy &#8211; what are we waiting for?, which sets out a very clear argument for decentralised energy. It runs for 18 minutes and is narrated by Clive Anderson. The film sets out a very clear argument for a profound rethink of the National Grid, using the argument that climate change means we have a rapidly reduce carbon emissions, rather than the, in my view, equally compelling argument that it is madness to use a depleting resource in such a wasteful way. The film looks at the jewel in the decentralisers’ crown, Woking, and argues that it offers a model for the rest of the UK.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Cole</title>
		<link>http://transitionculture.org/2006/06/23/greenpeace-launch-new-film-on-decentralised-energy/comment-page-1/#comment-1262</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jun 2006 01:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transitionculture.org/?p=383#comment-1262</guid>
		<description>Interesting to hear about the Malmo project.

Googling &quot;electricity balancing supply demand malmo&quot; yielded at least the following 3 articles:

1) http://www.managenergy.net/download/nr85.pdf A brief resume on the project, noting it&#039;s for 1000 homes
2) http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1271 a Californian&#039;s view on the project, mentioning Peak Oil as well as Santa Barbara having similar goals to get off carbon energy

3) http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2005/rx05195.pdf an interesting article on the challenges of maintaining electricity supply in changing times.  It makes the excellent case for &quot;Demand Response&quot; as the primary means of balancing supply and demand.  

The post-peak paradigm shift is one of demand-controlled supply to supply-controlled demand.  In other words, no spare capacity.  In the new paradigm, demand control will be the key ingredient towards stability of electricity distribution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to hear about the Malmo project.</p>
<p>Googling &#8220;electricity balancing supply demand malmo&#8221; yielded at least the following 3 articles:</p>
<p>1) <a href="http://www.managenergy.net/download/nr85.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.managenergy.net/download/nr85.pdf</a> A brief resume on the project, noting it&#8217;s for 1000 homes<br />
2) <a href="http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1271" rel="nofollow">http://www.energypulse.net/centers/article/article_display.cfm?a_id=1271</a> a Californian&#8217;s view on the project, mentioning Peak Oil as well as Santa Barbara having similar goals to get off carbon energy</p>
<p>3) <a href="http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2005/rx05195.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.ecn.nl/docs/library/report/2005/rx05195.pdf</a> an interesting article on the challenges of maintaining electricity supply in changing times.  It makes the excellent case for &#8220;Demand Response&#8221; as the primary means of balancing supply and demand.  </p>
<p>The post-peak paradigm shift is one of demand-controlled supply to supply-controlled demand.  In other words, no spare capacity.  In the new paradigm, demand control will be the key ingredient towards stability of electricity distribution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
